Prediction of Gail Brodsky vs Lauren Albanese Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Brodsky vs L. Albanese

Gail Brodsky
 USA
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
3
Played
2
Win
34
Age
36
-
Height
1.70m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
182
Best Rank
158
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$33.6K
Career Money
$55.6K
-
Plays
Right-handed

Lauren Albanese
 USA
l
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
3
Played
2
Win
34
Age
36
-
Height
1.70m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
182
Best Rank
158
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$33.6K
Career Money
$55.6K
-
Plays
Right-handed
Head-to-head: Brodsky 1 - 2 Albanese
They have played 8 sets in total, with Gail Brodsky winning 3 and Lauren Albanese winning 5. The last match between Lauren Albanese and Gail Brodsky was at the Surprise, 14-02-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Lauren Albanese getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Brodsky | 1 | 
| Albanese | 2 | 
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) Surprise(02-14-11)
Lauren Albanese
6
6
Gail Brodsky
1
4
(R1) Vancouver(07-28-08)
Gail Brodsky
7
3
6
Lauren Albanese
5
6
3
(R1) Carson(05-26-08)
Lauren Albanese
4
6
7
Gail Brodsky
6
4
5
G. Brodsky vs L. Albanese H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $33,595 | Career Prize Money | $55,600 | 
| 57.03% (146-110) | Career Total W/L | 51.71% (257-240) | 
| 1 | Hard | 2 | 
| 6 | Titles | 3 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 2 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
G. Brodsky vs L. Albanese Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gail Brodsky has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Lauren Albanese has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
 - Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gail Brodsky, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lauren Albanese has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
 - Under pressure analysis: Gail Brodsky has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lauren Albanese has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
 - Performance overview: Over the last year Gail Brodsky has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Lauren Albanese winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
 - Best surface: Gail Brodsky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 22/11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 4/4). Lauren Albanese has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 158/132), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/2).
 - Player level: In the last year, Gail Brodsky has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Lauren Albanese has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
 - Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Gail Brodsky winning 1 times and Lauren Albanese being victorious 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Gail Brodsky winning 3 and Lauren Albanese winning 5.
 - The last match between Gail Brodsky and Lauren Albanese was at the Surprise, 14-02-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Lauren Albanese getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
 - Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
 - Deciding set H2H prediction: Gail Brodsky and Lauren Albanese have played a deciding set 2 times, with Gail Brodsky winning 1 times and Lauren Albanese 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
 - Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gail Brodsky has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Lauren Albanese has played against players with an average rank of 0.
 - Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gail Brodsky has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lauren Albanese has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
 - Break point conversion: In recent form, Gail Brodsky has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lauren Albanese has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
 
Gail Brodsky vs Lauren Albanese Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Brodsky vs L. Albanese H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 | 
| 3 | Sets Won | 5 | 
| 36 | Games Won | 43 | 
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 
| 33% (1/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (2/3) | 
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) | 
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) | 
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Brodsky 0%, Albanese 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Brodsky 0%, Albanese 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Brodsky 0%, Albanese 0%.
G. Brodsky Recent Matches Played
L. Albanese Recent Matches Played

G. Brodsky vs L. Albanese Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.03% (146/110) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.02% (257/237) | 
| 53.96% (320/273) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.30% (580/529) | 
| 51.36% (2784/2637) | Games Win/Loss | 51.98% (5169/4775) | 
| 53.47% (77/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.48% (158/132) | 
| 60.56% (43/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.98% (78/75) | 
| 66.67% (22/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41.67% (20/28) | 
| 50.00% (4/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) | 
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 | 
| 188 | Aces Total | 251 | 
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 | 
| 368 | Total Double Faults | 178 | 
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 579.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 590.84 | 
| 55% (3244/5917) | 1st Serve % | 58% (4026/6950) | 
| 62% (2017/3244) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2499/4026) | 
| 44% (1175/2673) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1417/2924) | 
| 44% (333/759) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (340/770) | 
| 45% (2658/5922) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2961/7018) | 
| 12.50% (1/7) | Slam W/L | 35.29% (6/11) | 
| 0.00% (0/5) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/3) | 
| 45.45% (10/12) | Main Tour W/L | 21.43% (3/11) | 
| 56.82% (100/76) | Challenger W/L | 51.04% (197/189) | 
| 77.78% (35/10) | Futures W/L | 68.92% (51/23) | 
| 56% (137/246) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (252/479) | 
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) | 
| 52% (27/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 37% (36/97) | 
| 59% (52/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (63/133) | 
| 84% (141/119) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (265/227) | 
| 15% (141/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (265/34) | 
| 21% (114/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (229/28) | 
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:00 PM 04/11/25
PredictionW1
1.52
W2
2.33
07:00 PM 04/11/25
PredictionW1
1.25
W2
3.92
07:30 PM 04/11/25
PredictionW1
1.44
W2
2.55
07:00 AM 04/11/25
PredictionW1
1.133
W2
4.9
05:35 AM 04/11/25
PredictionW1
4.6
W2
1.151
04:00 PM 04/11/25
PredictionW1
1.117
W2
5.2
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
03 Nov 2025
Hina Inoue vs Renata Zarazua Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 3rd November 2025 Best Bets
03 Nov 2025
Marin Cilic vs Benjamin Hassan Prediction – ATP Helsinki Challenger – 3rd November 2025 Best Bets
03 Nov 2025
Marin Cilic vs Benjamin Hassan Prediction – ATP Helsinki Challenger – 3rd November 2025 Best Bets
03 Nov 2025
Matteo Berrettini vs Quentin Halys Prediction – ATP Moselle Open – 3rd November 2025 Best Bets
03 Nov 2025
Valentin Royer vs Cameron Norrie Prediction – ATP Moselle Open – 3rd November 2025 Best Bets
03 Nov 2025
Reilly Opelka vs Vit Kopriva Prediction – ATP Hellenic Championship – 3rd November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
18:30
H2H 8-3
H2H 5-6
17:00
H2H 3-3
17:00
H2H 3-3
Tennis Events This Week
Hellenic Championship - Athens
Greece
Moselle Open - Metz
France
Helsinki Challenger
Finland
Knoxville Challenger
United States
Lima 3 Challenger
Peru
Matsuyama Challenger
Japan
Taipei Challenger
Chinese Taipei
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Manama
Bahrain
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Valledupar
Colombia
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Valencia
Spain